NSU

Huizenga School of Business

Law and Ethics Classes

 

Case Study

 

U.S. Airways – Delta Air Lines Merger

 

Prepared by Professor F. Cavico

 

U.S. Airways unsolicited attempt, announced in November of 2006, to take over much bigger, though bankrupt Delta, would vault U.S. Airways into the largest carrier in the U.S. by number of passengers. The merged airline, furthermore, would have the largest market share in 155 of the nation’s 420 airports. The merger also would give the U.S. Airways a much stronger presence in Europe and South America, which are high margin international markets which are largely immune from incursions by the discount airlines. U.S. Airways is mainly a domestic carrier. In 2005, it merged with America West, but kept the U.S. Airways name. Delta is the number three airline in the U.S., after American Airlines and United Airlines, and has been expanding overseas since its acquisition of Pan Am in 1992. Many industry experts consider U.S. Airways acquisition of American West a success, since the merged company has cut costs, turned a profit, and raised share prices.

 

U.S. Airways chairman, Doug Parker, who was credited with the successful acquisition of American west, said the newly merged U.S. Airways – Delta airline would save $935 million by reducing overlap in flights, and cutting capacity by 10%. The proposed new airline would keep the Delta name. The merged airline would be the largest carrier in the U.S., eclipsing American Airlines. The merged airline would also be the largest airline in Florida. Delta has hubs in Atlanta, Cincinnati, and Salt Lake City; and U.S. Airways has hubs in Phoenix, Philadelphia, and Charlotte. If approved, the combined company would serve more than 350 destinations across five continents. It would be the largest carrier across the Atlantic, and the second largest carrier in the Caribbean, after American Airlines. U.S. Airways has not decided where the merged company would be based. U.S. Airways also said that the merger would allow it to optimize service at its hubs, though the airline did not specify exactly what impact the merger would have on the hubs. The combined company would produce annual revenues of about $28 billion. Delta carried 67,5 million passengers in the year ending July 2006, and U.S. Airways carried 32.7 million passengers. The deal probably would bring Delta out of bankruptcy court protection, where it has been since 2005.

 

The offer to buy Delta, now still in bankruptcy, would give its unsecured creditors $4 billion in cash and 78.5 million shares of U.S. Airways stock. U.S. Airways has received a commitment from Citigroup to provide $7.2 billion in new financing for the deal. As for Delta’s shareholders, right now, its common shares are most likely to end up worthless when and if the carrier emerges from bankruptcy. In most bankruptcy cases, the debt holders end up with the new shares of the company.

 

The proposed merger, however, could leave consumers with fewer flight options and higher ticket prices, according to some industry experts, since the latest consolidation of the airline industry further reduces the number of flights available to consumers. In South Florida, for example, the combined company would control more than 40% of the flights from Palm Beach International Airport; and would carry about 28% of all passengers from Ft. LauderdaleHollywood International Airport. Consumer groups are also concerned that the merger would devalue their frequent flyer mileage accounts at Delta. U.S. Airways, however, stated that it would preserve the frequent flyer mileage of Delta passengers, and merge those miles into the U.S. Airways account.

 

The combined airline would have about 85,000 employees. Although the combined airline is expected to fly with about 10% fewer planes, no job cuts have been predicted yet. Labor unions could emerge as a complicating factor. Pilots, machinists, and flight attendants, all strongly unionized, could hinder plans by U.S. Airways to achieve cost savings. Another employment problem would be in the integration of the two airlines employees, since a huge seniority integration problem would emerge. U.S. Airways is still trying to work out seniority issues from its acquisition of America West.

 

Industry analysts predict that U.S. Airways $8 billion bid for bankrupt Delta will produce a merger wave in the airline industry, and one, moreover, that will allow the more established carriers better positioned to compete against the “discount airlines,” such as Jet Blue, Trans Air, and Southwest. Industry analysts have long said that the airline industry is still too fragmented, and thus is ready for even more consolidation. Wall Street investors have predicted that the deal, if approved, would curb discounts. Moreover, shares of American Airlines and Continental also surged, reaching their highest levels since the 9-11 terrorist attacks.

 

Actually, the shares of the discount airlines rose after the announcement of the merger due to the talk of stronger pricing as well as the speculation that other airlines would merge in order to stay competitive in an increasingly consolidated market. Now, low-cost airlines, such as Southwest, control a larger percentage of the market, carrying 25% of domestic passengers in the U.S. in 2006, up from 18% in 2000. As for U.S. Airways, its stock immediately went up 17% on the announcement of the takeover attempt.

 

Whether the merger will succeed is a difficult question to answer. It is very difficult to buy a company when its management is opposed, and particularly so when the company is in bankruptcy court. Delta’s management is still opposed to the takeover; and it still runs the day-to-day affairs of the airline as it tries to emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, which is expected next year. Delta’s Chief Executive, Gerald Grinstein, stated that Delta would review the merger proposal, but would still continue to pursue its goal to file its reorganization plan and emerge from bankruptcy in 2007 as a strong, stand-alone carrier. Yet because Delta is in bankruptcy proceedings, its creditors could have a say in approving the merger. U.S. Airways chief executive, Doug Parker, said that he believed the offer for Delta was a fair one, and that ultimately Delta’s management as well as its creditors will see that fact. U.S. Airways’ proposal, he said, was much better for creditors than Delta’s stand-alone plan. One of Delta’s creditors is American Express, which in 2004, purchased $90 million of Delta Sky Miles for use in a charge card it co-branded with Delta. The bankruptcy code requires that at least one-half of the creditors by number, and two-thirds by the value of their claims, approve the restructuring plan. It is up to Delta’s management to demonstrate to its creditors that it can come up with a better plan than U.S. Airway’s takeover offer.

 

Government regulators must also approve the merger; and are expected to be concerned about the combined airline’s dominance in the Northeast corridor. In order to help satisfy antitrust concerns, U.S. Airways said it would sell Delta’s competing shuttle services in the Northeast. The merge cold also face scrutiny by the U.S. Congress. The new head of the Transportation Committee in the House of Representatives, Representative Jim Oberstar from Minnesota, has stated that he would hold hearings as to the consequences of the merger, especially on the price of air fares and the service to be provided to small communities; and he also urged the Justice Department to hold hearings on the merger. He stated that he was concerned because mergers reduce competition and thereby increase costs for travelers. Congress, however, has no formal role in approving proposed mergers; but of course members of Congress can apply a great deal of pressure on federal regulators. A Justice Department official said the department was preparing for a review the proposed merger. One industry expert “handicapped” the merger’s chances for success at 40%. Of course, there could be other bidders for Delta, which naturally would further complicate things.

 

Bibliography:

 

Cordle, Ina Paiva, “Flight Plan,” The Miami Herald, November 16, 2006, pp. 1C, 2C;  Foust, Dean, “Now Boarding: Merger Mania,” Business Week, November 27, 2006, p. 36; Steighhorst, Tom, “Rival bids $8 billion for Delta,” November 16, 2006, pp. 1A, 9A; Trotman, Melanie, and Perez, Evan, “Hostile Bid for Delta Signals Airline Merger Wave May Begin,” The Wall Street Journal, November 16, 2006, pp. A1, A11.

 

Questions for Discussion:

 

  1. Is the proposed merger legal? Why or why not?
  2. Should the government regulators, bankruptcy judge, and Delta creditors approve the merger? Should the Delta management continue to oppose it? Discuss.
  3. Is it moral pursuant to Utilitarian and Kantian ethics? Discuss.
  4. What should a “socially responsible” merged airline be doing for the community and society? Discuss, providing examples.
  5. From the standpoint of U.S. Air, does this attempted “hostile takeover” pass the test of Value-Driven Management? Why or why not?